Censorship: The greatest thing in the world XD I have to admit that since I came to the forum
Fantasy Magazine, the other day, I balked a lot about a person, why is all the more obscene it is Web .
wants to become a writer, five or seven years (can not remember very well) is working in this direction, without getting the desired results.
wants to criticize bad books of writers who know very little Italian, but makes glaring errors in grammar and spelling, citing as an excuse to not being able to use very well the PC keyboard. It
little lesson, whether in textual criticism, Italian or good writing, not required to whoever happens to throw, not to mention that those who could land on his blog (and not only there), may well know better than those given her things. Of course most of the little lesson are full of errors and uncertainties have misinterpreted what he read.
After commenting on the forums of FM in a very sour and pedantic (things I'm very proud, because when I turn the Quaffle and read certain things, I can not stop myself), I landed on his blog and I read the review in The Hobbit, a book that I read several times and I love it. So you can imagine what might have written when I read a review that it is not clear until the last moment whether it is positive or negative.
quote here my post, so you will not put unnecessary link to that blog, I will not do too much advertising (: p):
Sorry if I come here to break even, but you know, when I take I do some sight to the end: p
A couple of things:
- the summary of the book seemed lengthy and, frankly, I would have done without, especially if, as a reader, I read the book and enjoy it. The summary, because of its length and verbosity, free of all that is beautiful in The Hobbit;
- the comment I know a lot of artifact, explaining the pros and cons (the latter is absolutely questionable) without giving anything to the reader comment, you do not even dwell on your personal opinion, which should be essential, otherwise you do not know if you want to recommend for or the book (and I assure you that the final vote is not enough, since there says nothing);
- from the drawbacks that are really questionable, because (as you just mentioned) the intervention of Tolkien, and then the narrator is funny and something fundamental in a fairy tale, in this case, anything negative is going dim and somewhat detached from what the narrator is telling if it is too heavy for the ring saying that it has a big importance in this book, because it is so, the story of how Bilbo found it and used it for the first time, but as you said let the subtitle understood as a journey and you can stop on a particular marginal as the discovery of the ring. One minor problem: The
Naturasia all our products so powerful as to render invisible, in fact, is neither disclosed nor just mentioned.
really understand it, and a point (and maybe more) of the book is just said that Bilbo becomes invisible thanks to the ring, if I remember correctly it is one of the dwarves (or even Gandalf) to discover this small .
However the ring will be more important later, and only those who have read The Hobbit can fully understand The Lord of the Rings, because there are many things in common. The Hobbit is important for The Lord of the Rings and vice versa;
- I found much more senseless disappearances of Gandalf, the comparison of the ring, but in part I understand that the book was not focused on the wizard, but on Bilbo, the dwarves and their mission and therefore not to be told that much of Gandalf.
Well I said everything, I would like now that you did not respond as usual with a lecture on Tolkien or more in the book, because I think I have not really needed (the documents I know and I think those steps here and is as I have enough lessons from a little girl). I just want to know if my criticisms are fair or not. I recommend, read what I wrote well and do not say much in response, the new keyboard costs , P
As you can see, my post is a simple return to the point of view of someone who is very familiar with the topic and found the negative points raised by Miss very questionable, even though she will pretend to be objective and so, in principle, unassailable.
His response?
Dear Lady Carol, my answer is simple. You do not like how I review? Well, do not read. Your next comment will be censored, you are warned.
Wow, a response worthy of bimbeminkia ficcy who write because they are fashionable and when you try to reason with him on certain things, you slam into the face of traditional phrase "Do not you like? Do not read." What a pity, though, that both the network and I Haun, in my spare time, here and there and leave comments more or less ferocious to those who obviously do not know enough, either because ; I like the school teacher (especially when I see some little people XD), and because they are so fun to be a bastard world.
Unfortunately, the madam did not read what I wrote (as I had planned) and therefore has not been able to respond to my criticism, being able to show off its culture (which I seemed to understand stopping to Tolkien).
bad, could be a little 'more mature, but you can not have everything in this world.
Lady Carol, who really knows when he wants to be a bastard to the core XD (especially when he sees certain attitudes around the vast web)
EDIT: I realized something just now that Miss referred to above might I wrote after my comment (I do not know why but I feel a guilty conscience andarmi focus in his post ...), on the explanation of the vote gives cha books
PS: If someone does not like my way of review, even if they go elsewhere. If you find objectionable in my opinion, politely expressed his doubts and will be gratefully received.
I do not know, I smell a lot of the aforementioned "Do not you like? Do not read", ignoring that his opinions are not (from the dictionary:
"what you think of someone or something without the certainty of being right ", too bad that in the post I commented that there is no track review, but only a mass of words words words (cited) empty, that have nothing to do with what the think Miss) , I have I done holding out all the bitterness (because in my reply I assure you there is all XD) at the time what was wrong and I was told I could not say anything else because I would have been censored. If this is freedom of speech, opinion, expression, I am Napoleon.
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=1){kind=small}
mokona_89 ^ ^ 
![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/community.gif?v=1){kind=small}
